Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel Penny's avatar

I love cities and grew up in Brooklyn, but I don’t think they always produce the social interactions you describe. The anomie of an apartment block is an old cliche. I’m currently living in Provincetown, which only has about 2,500 people in the off-season, and it’s the most tightly knit community I’ve ever been a part of. The houses are definitely close together and everything is walkable and bike-friendly, but on a much smaller scale than. Towns across the US used to be more like this, and villages in England (where I’ve also lived) still are. The issue isn’t cities vs suburbs, it’s about making all communities more dense, livable and human-scale, rather than building them for cars.

Expand full comment
Nate Dreyfuss's avatar

It's worth giving some credit to Washington, D.C. (and certain of its suburbs, particularly Arlington), which has done a decent job of building the housing units to actually allow people to live in the City in the last fifteen years or so. It's no Houston or Austin, but it also is not my sclerotic, expensive, New York. If we want to encourage people to live in cities and have the bike-sharing, park-hanging, productive-dynamic lifestyles that we and so many others love, we need to actually permit the building of enough housing to accommodate the people who would want to live there. Otherwise, those same people, those same potential neighbors, colleagues, and friends, will end up in Houston or--god forbid--Ashburn, where we've allowed new houses to be built.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts